Government Consumer Watchdog Takes Aim at Bank Overdraft Fees

The government's consumer protection agency plans to take a closer look at expensive overdraft fees

February 22, 2012 RSS Feed Print

Those pesky overdraft fees big banks slam consumers with will come under greater scrutiny by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the agency announced Wednesday.

The announcement comes just days after the government consumer watchdog laid out plans to bring the largest debt collectors and credit reporting agencies under federal supervision for the first time ever, expanding their reach and influence in the financial services sector.

The probe will involve investigating banks' overdraft fee practices including how the fees affect consumers, how overdraft protection is marketed, and what information consumers receive, the Associated Press reported.

"Overdraft practices have the capacity to inflict serious economic harm on the people who can least afford it," CFPB Director Richard Cordray said in a statement. "We want to learn how consumers are affected, and how well they are able to anticipate and avoid paying penalty fees."

[See today's best photos.]

Overdraft fees—what banks charge customers when they take out or spend more money than they have in their account—can go as high $35 a pop, and generate billions of dollars in revenue for banks.

The CFPB and other consumer advocates are worried that the allure of making green from consumers going into the red could be causing banks to structure their overdraft policies and marketing in a way that's confusing or even predatory.

"It's very important for the CFPB to investigate and take action to better protect consumers from outrageously high and unfair overdraft fees," says Jean Ann Fox, director of financial services for the Consumer Federation of America. "Just as with mortgage servicing and credit card issues, bank accounts are a very widespread financial product and overdraft fees and practices are the most critical issue for consumers struggling to make ends meet and [who] want to remain in mainstream banking."

"This affects a lot of people," Fox adds.

One example of a questionable practice Fox cites is known as re-ordering and involves banks assembling all transactions from the day and rearranging them from largest to smallest, in effect maximizing the number of transactions that trigger the overdraft fee.

"Transaction re-ordering just strikes consumers as blatantly unfair," Fox says. "The CFPB needs to look at bank practices for all types of transactions, not just debit card, point-of-sale, or ATM."

[Read: Despite Inflation Forecast, Prices on Everyday Items Expected to Climb this Year.]

The consumer watchdog agency is also toying with the idea of a "penalty fee box" that would be included on account statements to break down any overdraft or other fees incurred.

At this stage, the investigation is about collecting data and finding out how certain bank policies impact consumers, but findings could prompt new rules or even lawsuits if wrongdoing is discovered, multiple sources say.

"We're very positive about the announced program," Fox says. "This is the start of their fact-finding and investigation of banks and request for input from consumers, so the CFPB can build a record to support—hopefully—reforms that have widespread consumer support."

mhandley@usnews.com

Twitter: @mmhandley

Tags:
banking,
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau,
consumers

Reader Comments Read all comments (4)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

The current BofA practice of allowing *any* merchant to debit a checking account without hindrance is IME the cause of some major hits with regard to fees. The bank has even allowed debits from my account by Netflix that came with a totally different name attached - and never questioned them.

Recently I had three merchants suddenly resurrect subscriptions that had been canceled the year before (and we had had no product or communication during that time).

The bank has a rule that direct debits attract a $35 fee if the account is in the red, and at the time the account had gone into the red because my UI was delayed by one day. Each of the debits attracted $35 in fees immediately (same day - no waiting period), taking the account even further into the red.

I wasn't about to pour money into a hole of the bank's own making, so I used another account to deposit the UI and work with it.

The bank's attitude was: get the merchants to reverse their debits, and we'll reverse the fees. So I did that - but no fee reversal. So I waited a few days, because merchants indicated that the time to reverse the amounts was entirely in the bank's hands. The mechants initiated the reversals immediately, to their credit (but never explained why the subscriptions were suddenly resurrected).

When I called the bank five days later (after yet another set of fees), I was told "you should have called us to ask us to reverse the fees" and they refused to take responsibility for the extra fees incurred. It's now my responsibility to remind them to undo their unreasonable and unfair actions?

The result: so far I've persuaded them to reverse $70 in fees, but there's still another $175 in fees that they say they can do nothing about.

Today, American Greetings just took a second annual subscription fee from the account (they legitimately took one annual payment last month), and I'm sure that if that unchecked and unquestioned deduction causes the account to overdraw, there'll be another $35 fee hitting me between the eyes.

Years ago no-one could take money from your bank account without the bank checking with you first (unless it was a direct debit authorised in writing). What happened to that policy? Is it part of the new business model - make billions in unwarranted and unreasonable fees?

And how is the $35 fee justified? The modern bank is nowhere near as labor-intensive as it used to be so the claim that it's costing them time and money to process such transactions frankly doesn't wash - or shouldn't.

CFPB site here I come...

Peter of CA 7:32PM March 11, 2012

Here's some info for the CFPB's fact-finding: Checking account at BestBank (not even close to what I call them), under parent bank: Guarentee Bank (guarenteed to rip you off!), had an NSF of $58.14 over account balance. This generated a $35.00 nsf fee making the account a negative $93.14. This negative balance has morphed into a negative balance of over $400.00 in less than a month's time due to a DAILY nsf fee being charged of $28.00 for every day the account is in a negative status, as of Friday I was told 11 days, their letter received states a max. of 14. CSRs over the phone would not close the account orally, stating that it had to be in writing. An in-person contact with a representative at branch would not close the account due to it being in the red. Guess that's how they plan on getting their max of 14 days. Oh, need I forget their letter so graciously offers a "Fresh Start Repayment Plan" that is customized to fit my budget and get this, interest free! My budget is ZERO. My husband has been out of work for over 4 years and due to injuries incurred on my job of over 25 years, I haven't been back to work since Feb. 2011. Do you think that just maybe there might be something drastically wrong here? Predatory doesn't seem near enough a description of this bank's practices.

Karen Theiss of GA 5:09AM March 11, 2012

It's about time somebody stopped the banks from processing largest to smallest transactions. Having worked for a bank in data processing years ago, I know back then we processed smallest to largest transactions. This process has cost me hundreds of dollars over the last 5 years. Many of my credit problems would not have happened if the processing order were reversed. Additionally, not only do you get a fee from the bank, but generally you have to pay and additional fee to the company processing the check. This almost doubles the fees you are paying.

Donald W Pourciau of LA 12:40AM March 05, 2012

Photo Galleries

Daredevils

Extreme risk-takers of today and throughout history.

advertisement

Latest Video